2 Cool Fishing Forum banner
1 - 20 of 27 Posts

· http://talesofhumor.blogspot.com/
Joined
·
4,607 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Annual 'Dead Zone' Spreads Across Gulf of Mexico

By Jeff Franks
HOUSTON (Reuters) - A huge "dead zone" of water so devoid of oxygen that sea life cannot live in it has spread across 5,800 square miles of the Gulf of Mexico this summer in what has become an annual occurrence caused by pollution.
The extensive area of uninhabitable water may be contributing indirectly to an unusual spate of shark bites along the Texas coast, experts said.
A scientist at the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium said on Tuesday measurements showed the dead zone extended from the mouth of the Mississippi River in southeastern Louisiana 250 miles west to near the Texas border and was closer to shore than usual because winds and currents.
"Fish and swimming crabs escape (from the dead zone)," said Nancy Rabalais, the consortium's chief scientist for hypoxia, or low oxygen, research. "Anything else dies."
In the last 30 years, the dead zone has become an annual summer phenomenon, fed by rising use of nitrate-based fertilizers by farmers in the Mississippi watershed, Rabalais told Reuters.
The nitrates, carried into the gulf's warm summer waters by the river, feed algae blooms that use up oxygen and make the water uninhabitable.
The dead zone's size has varied each year depending on weather conditions, but averages about 5,000 square miles and remains in place until late September or early October.
Virtually nothing is being done to stop the flow of nitrates into the river, meaning the dead zone will reappear every year, Rabalais said.
The dead zone forces fish to seek better water, which may be a reason for the recent shark bites on Texas beaches.
Three people have been bitten by sharks along the upper Texas coast this year -- a high number for a state that has recorded only 18 shark attacks since 1980.
Terry Stelly, an ecosystem biologist with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, said increasing numbers of sharks have been found in recent years in the waters along the Texas-Louisiana border, near the edge of the dead zone.
Along with other factors, "chances are good they (sharks) were looking for higher dissolved oxygen in the water," he said.
Rabalais agreed, saying "The higher number of sharks in shallow waters may very likely be due to the low oxygen being close to the shore at the time of the attacks."
"The available habitat for the sharks is definitely less when the low oxygen is so widespread," she said.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,061 Posts
Bs

I call BS on this one. I just flew over the "dead zone" on Sunday and there were shrimp boats all over the place down there. They wouldn't be there if there weren't things to harvest there. I think this is blown way out of proportion, and to blame the shark attacks on this is total BS. The shark attacks were caused by a stringer/donet being too close to the person and a girl wearing silver toenail polish. Duh. Yellow journalism at its finest.

NK Out.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,873 Posts
In my estimation, one of the contributing factors to the shark bites is the wanton killing of large sharks over the past 15 to 20 years. This has significantly depleted the predators that would otherwise be feeding on many of the smaller sharks in the surf zone. This also potentially accounts for the seemingly overwhelming numbers of small blacktips and sandsharks within 30 miles of the surf that are such a problem for snapper fishermen.

I am not saying that polution is good. Its just that the polution/dead zone area data does not have a strong correlation with the numbers of shark bites over the years in which it has been tracked.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
23,832 Posts
there was an article in today's Galveston Daily news wondering if all the dead fish floating out there from the shrimpers aren't a part of the problem. Since that stuff is steadily washing up on the beach, it's certainly food for thought, or in this case, food for sharks.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,036 Posts
Is this, by any chance, the host to the flesh eating virus that we're all talking about?
 

· An Over 60 Victim Of Fate
Joined
·
23,551 Posts
Why BS? This article is blaming nitrates that are being washed into the Gulf and if you think that's BS then you better do some more research.

It's very logical that if there is a "dead zone" that fish would be anywhere but in that area, sharks included. To say that the shark attacks are due to this is stretching it a bit, but it does make sense that populations of sharks and other fish that would have to be in places other than the "dead zone" so why not the beach front?

Pollution in the area of the delta is a huge problem right now and unfortunately it will get worse before it gets better.

TH
 

· http://www.profishingresearch.co m
Joined
·
2,895 Posts
Those shrimpers that are said to be in the dead zone working should knot be able to sell those shrimp as table fare!

Bigwater
 

· Wherever you are....BLOOM!
Joined
·
5,764 Posts
Aunt Joyce...

The bacteria responsible for the vibrio "infection" have been present since days of Genesis. They are not contaminants but are naturally occuring bacteria and seem to thrive during warm months and especially if the mix of fresh/salt water is about 50:50. The above average rainfall amounts during June are chief contributors, IMHO, to the rash of occurrences. I understand that the bacteria needs salt to survive but cannot survive high salt concentrations.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,491 Posts
sharks...

all i do know for fact is that in the areas i have been wade fishing for 15-20 years i have seen/brush up against 10X's as many bigger sharks in the bay than in the previous 17 yrs. something has changed. remember the bill fish kill off the coast of florida last year? sounds like with some different winds the "dead zone" may have drifted over there. then add a 1 shark limit to the equation... there's probably many factors all worth some consideration. 2 bites in three day in the galveston area. that sounds more like the florida coast last year. which is also where the marlin kill was found. maybe the dead zone near fla last year contributed to more shark bites there last year na dmaybe with it being near tx this year is a factor woth consideration.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
12,873 Posts
My recollection is that the bill fish kill in Florida was on the Atlantic - at least if its the one I am thinking of that was related to cooler water temps. No one that I am aware of is suggesting that the dead zone passed through the Florida straight and headed up the coast in the Atlantic and killed all those sails. Then again, we may be talking about two different kills. Was there a major bill fish kill in the GOM last year?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,908 Posts
I wouldn't be so quick on the gun

Team Sponge said:
It is physically impossible to have a "dead zone" in any body of water as large as the Gulf of Mexico. Whatever idiot came up with this should be shot on sight.
There actually is quite a bit of research ongoing regarding the "dead zones." The great lakes have had the same problem in years past as have many other coastal regions across the world. Do a little research on it and come to your own conclusion but I wouldn't make a statement like that right off the bat. It is an area where the dissolved oxygen in the water is too low to support many forms of marine life. Some species are more tolerant of the low dissolved oxygen while others can't handle it and must flee, or die if they can't. Drier years in the Mississppi watershed will reduce the affect of the dead zone in the GOM but wet years during the spring and early summer can increase its affect. Do a Google search and you'll find all kinds of studies and articles re: it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
453 Posts
I caught a limit of trout in the dead zone yesterday - they all looked alive to me. It is a serious issue though I believe overstated at present. That doesn't mean it won't get worse. But if you want to talk about the environmental disaster of the century (for the US GOM) let's talk about the serious erosion problems facing the Louisiana wetlands - America's largest estuary. Acres an HOUR!

if you don't know please visit http://www.americaswetland.com/
and learn - it affects the entire Gulf Coast and it is very serious
 
1 - 20 of 27 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top