Can anyone tell me why braid manufacturers compare the strength of a braid to a mono equivalent of the same diameter? I might be confusing the issue here and might not be understanding how it all fits together but its my understanding and would like some clarity - sure many of you understand this better than i do. My question is, are they using an industry standard mono to compare it to? I`m assuming they`re not, so how can that reference be accurate? So, Fins compares their 40lb braid diameter to 6lb mono - the 6lb reference is to that of the breaking strain of mono in the same diameter class - that referenced mono could have a different breaking strain depending on the manufacturer. ie, Suffix mono with diameter "x" can be in a different lb test class than mono from Berkley with the same diameter. How do they then simply reference the diameter of their braid to a general 6lb class mono equivalent?
When looking at braid i always reference breaking strain to diameter of the braid as it`ll influence your casting ability and sensitivity among other things. Thinner braid per breaking strain is always better for obvious reasons and hence the price difference when it comes to paying more for literally less.
I have been using Gator Braid for the past 5 years, the diameter in combination with breaking strain and smoothness of the braid has been the main reason Ive always gone back. Now that Fins is on par with what i have been using i`d definitely consider Fins going forward. Attached - 33lb has a diameter of 0.14mm