Home  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise   |   Follow:

Go Back   2CoolFishing > Hunting and Shooting Forums > Firearms/Reloading/Handloading Forum

Firearms/Reloading/Handloading Forum A place for those to gather that enjoy shooting, firearms, and making their own rounds. Everything here is available at your own risk, use caution. All of the site rules apply here and please keep in mind, this is a public forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2012, 05:09 PM
JDog JDog is offline
Registered Users-pm+
 
Join Date: May 21 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 21117
JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog
.300 WM Loading Questions

So I loaded up some rounds in January, fired 'em and found a promising load. I did 5 rounds per charge and tried to make the cases per group as close to the same length as possible. Most were in the 2.620 which is the max length, but those that were 2.615 I'd group together, etc.

So after that range trip, I'm just now getting back to loading up two promising charges from that previous range trip. Not surprisingly my cases have exceeded max case length and are now 2.650 or so. No big deal, and I trim them all up. My trim gauge ends up trimming them all to anywhere between 2.614 and 2.616. They're actually more uniform than before. So my question is this, how important for accuracy is it that the case length of my promising load was 2.620 and now the case will be 2.614? I'm looking for sub MOA (or hopefully 1/2 MOA) accuracy but at 100 yards. I'm not a long range guy so will this case length difference be negligble? I got 3 shots in one hole and then pulled one in January, so I'm REALLY hoping this recipe is a winner.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2012, 01:57 PM
Reloder28 Reloder28 is offline
Registered Users-pm+
 
Join Date: Apr 10 2010
Posts: 852
Rep Power: 6437329
Reloder28 has disabled reputation
No, the .006 won't make any difference in your accuracy. You'd have to work up a new load every time you trimmed if it did. Trim lengths are quite forgiving.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:13 PM
JDog JDog is offline
Registered Users-pm+
 
Join Date: May 21 2004
Age: 41
Posts: 175
Rep Power: 21117
JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog JDog
Sooooooo

so switching calibers, for my .223 my trim lengths are 1.748-1.551. Again, you're saying I don't really need to sweat .003, or any probably any differences under say .01. Man, I'm driving myself crazy trying to get these things to be exact.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2012, 02:40 PM
davidb davidb is offline
Registered Users-pm+
 
Join Date: May 10 2006
Posts: 757
Rep Power: 160647
davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb davidb
Just trim all to the shortest length. Usually .005 under maximum. Check the manuals.

Uniformity is the most important aspect. Only a real problem if your pushing the maximum length, this can jack up pressures and won't do much for accuracy.

Bullet run out is a much bigger accuracy factor. If they are loaded straight they go out the barrel straighter.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
copyright 2013
© 2008 Noreast Media, LLC | Terms of Service| Contact Us | Advertise