Home  |  Contact Us  |  Advertise   |   Follow:

Go Back   2CoolFishing > Saltwater Fishing Forums > Conservation Crossfire/Fisheries Issues

Conservation Crossfire/Fisheries Issues A place for everyone interested in fisheries discussion from a regulatory/political standpoint. The laws surrounding fishing and our fisheries are changing, and this is the place to learn about changes on the horizon. Please keep it civil. We can disagree with one another, without becoming disagreeable.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 03-04-2010, 11:17 PM
hilton's Avatar
hilton hilton is offline

 
Join Date: Jan 28 2008
Posts: 3,392
Rep Power: 17784588
hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton hilton
NMFS BS

Howdy,

Here's a quote from NMFS Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council Voting Council Member Robin Riechers;

"The mean weight of red snapper retained by recreational anglers during the 2007 season was 3.4 pounds, said Robin Riechers, Gulf Council member and director of Texas Parks and Wildlife Department's coastal fisheries division.

That average weight increased to 4.07 pounds in 2008 and jumped to 5 pounds this past year, he said.

“The good news is that fishermen are catching bigger snapper and catching them at a faster pace,” Riechers said. “The down side is that it takes fewer snapper and fewer days for them to reach their annual allowable catch.”

Now, here's a quote from NOAA administrator Lubchenco responding to Senator LeMieux at the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee meeting this week;

"With respect to the red snapper fishery, I understand that fishermen may not have confidence in the data but this is not a situation where we don't have good information. Uh, I think the challenge with something like red snapper is that, umm, the, uhh, calculations about what is a sustainable level of fish take into account, uhh, how, uhh, what size the fish are, uhh, and what many of the fishermen are seeing are lots and lots of younger fish and are assuming that, uhh, that means that they are recovered and that there are plenty out there. In fact, uhh, it's important for those younger fish to get larger and reproduce for the future health of the fishery. And the complication with red snapper is very much that it is a directed fishery and they are also bycatch in other fisheries, for example grouper. So, they get hammered both directly and indirectly and uhh we have been working hard to try to find the right balance in allowing some fishing to happen but not preventing, uhh, the recovery of those stocks."

Seems to me that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing here; On one hand, they claim they have to reduce our season because the fish, on average, were much larger than before...and on the other hand, they are saying that they must reduce our season because the fish are too young and need to be able to reproduce.

Anybody else see the "Heads I win/Tails you lose" scenario here?

Tom Hilton
__________________
Map Maker, Reef Maker, and "Environmental Consultant"
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
copyright 2013
© 2008 Noreast Media, LLC | Terms of Service| Contact Us | Advertise